fbpx mersin escort Güvenilir canlı bahis siteleri gaziantep escort canlı bahis Aренда яхты Турция мармарис экскурсии Güvenilir casino siteleri Bahis sitesi slot siteleri deneme bonusu veren siteler bonus veren siteler bahis siteleri
[Infographic] A Guide to Mobile App Development: Web vs. Native vs. Hybrid
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on email
Share on print

There are three main mobile app types you can explore for your mobile app development project: web, native and hybrid. All three development paths hold intrinsic value, but which approach is right for your project?

Depending on your business objectives and overall product goals, this decision can make or break the success of your mobile strategy. Deciding to build your mobile product as either a web, native or hybrid app involves a variety of factors for consideration. This comparative piece will examine all three options, and at the end of the post, we’ve included an infographic outlining the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.


New call-to-action


Web App Development


How are web apps different from websites? A website typically offers more information than a web app can display, therefore web apps condense website content to improve functionality. A web app loads in browsers like Chrome, Safari, or Firefox, and doesn’t need to be downloaded from app stores like native mobile apps. Web apps also don’t take up storage on the user’s device.

If your goal is to offer mobile-friendly content to a wide range of users, a web app might be the appropriate development path. Web apps are a cost-effective way to put your product in the hands of a lot of users. Keep in mind, users have incredibly high user experience and functionality standards that web apps sometimes can’t deliver. Users are easily frustrated with performance and usability issues like load times, small images, and network availability.


How Do You Build a Web App?


Typically, web apps are built using JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5 and run inside a web browser. There is no software development kit for developers to use; however, there are templates for them to work with. If you choose to develop a web app, it can be straightforward and quick to build. Although, web apps are often oversimplified and don’t offer the same features a native app can deliver.


What are Progressive Web Apps?

Progressive web apps (PWAs) are hybrids of regular web pages and native apps. Overall, web apps lack the functionality of native apps, such as sending push notifications or working offline. Browsers and web apps, however, are becoming more advanced. Now, PWAs can leverage features similar to native apps. Improved functionalities include:

  • Sending push notifications
  • Access to device hardware like vibration
  • Improved touch gestures


Despite these improvements,  PWAs are only compatible with Google Chrome. This means iOS users can’t use this type of web app. Depending on your business goals and monetization strategy, excluding iOS users can be a huge disadvantage because iOS users spend the most money on apps and on in-app purchases.


Advantages of Web Apps


  • Web apps are relatively easy to maintain because they use a common code base across multiple mobile platforms.
  • Web apps can be built for all platforms as long as they can run in an appropriate web browser.
  • Compared to native apps, web apps are less expensive upfront.
  • Web apps don’t adhere to standard operating system protocols and don’t require approval from the app marketplace; they can be released at any time and in any format.
  • Updates to web apps don’t need to go through an app store meaning the user doesn’t have to manage updates manually. The newest version always loads when a user opens a web app.


Disadvantages of Web Apps


  • Web apps have a much smaller scope when it comes to leveraging device features and hardware.
  • A browser is required to run a web app. Users have to take more steps to use a web app, whether that’s searching for the page or typing in a URL. Either way, more effort complicates the user experience.
  • Users interact with different web browsers and as a result, the usage patterns and performance metrics used to create a product roadmap are more difficult to collect.
  • Unless a web app marketed well, web apps have poor discoverability because they’re not listed in the app store.
  • Web apps are slower and much less responsive than native apps.
  • Web apps are less interactive and intuitive compared to native apps.
  • There are fewer branding opportunities with web apps. An app store listing presents an invaluable opportunity to convey an app’s unique value proposition.


Native App Development


Native mobile apps are the most common type of app. They are built for specific platforms and are written in languages that the platform accepts. For example, Swift and Objective-C for native iOS apps and Java or Kotlin for native Android apps. Native apps are also built using the specific Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for the selected operating systems.

Both Apple and Google provide app developers with their own development tools, interface elements, and SDK. Most companies will invest in native mobile app development because of the multitude of benefits offered in comparison to other types of apps.


New call-to-action


Advantages of Native Apps


  • Native apps deliver the best performance of all three development approaches.
  • Native apps receive complete support from app stores and the overall app marketplace. Distribution in app stores helps with discoverability.
  • Native apps are interactive, intuitive, and run more smoothly in terms of user input and output.
  • Native development allows developers to access the full feature set of the selected operating system.
  • The user experience of native apps is far superior to web apps or hybrid apps. To the user, the flow is more natural because of each mobile operating system’s specific UI guidelines and standards.
  • A native app must be approved by its respective operating system which assures quality, security, and device compatibility.


Disadvantages of Native Apps


  • Native apps use difficult programming languages which require experienced developers.
  • Expenses are more costly upfront for native apps compared to web or hybrid apps.
  • Native apps are not the best option for simple applications.


While the initial cost of native mobile app development may be higher than other options, this development approach will save money over time. By offering a great user experience, better performance and accessibility, native apps are able to offer users a more personalized product. The multiple advantages of native apps will result in higher conversion rates and long-term customer loyalty.


Clearbridge Mobile has launched over 250 successful mobile solutions that have helped companies solve complex business problems. 

New call-to-action


Is There Another Development Path?


With native app development, you have to build different apps for different operating systems; however, developers have new technology for programming. Two platforms, in particular, Xamarin and React Native can sometimes be classified as other types of native app development.


Xamarin App Development


Xamarin lets developers build one app that runs on many platforms using C#. With C#-shared codebase, developers can use Xamarin tools to write native iOS, Android, and Windows applications with native user interfaces and share code across multiple platforms.


React Native App Development


React Native also allows developers to build authentic native iOS and Android apps with one codebase. With React Native, developers can create a mobile app that’s identical to a product developed using either Objective-C or Java. React Native, however, is written in JavaScript and React.

In mobile app development, the term native is defined as an ecosystem that Apple or Google, for example, chooses for developing apps for their operating systems. Xamarin and React Native technology is very complex and can be classified as either native or hybrid. Xamarin can be considered a native and a hybrid development platform, as it builds native Android, iOS, and Windows apps in C#, with either Visual Studio or Xamarin Studio. It also creates hybrid applications for multiple operating systems using C# codebase, IDE, language, and APIs. However, since there is another layer between the code and the platform, many people consider it hybrid development.


Hybrid App Development


Hybrid apps work across multiple platforms and behave like native apps. A hybrid app is essentially a combination of a native app and a web app. Although this type of app can be installed on a device like a native app, it technically is a web app.  These types of apps are built with HTML, CSS, or JavaScript and run in a webview.

Hybrid app development is essentially a web app that incorporates additional native features. Including native features is possible when you deploy a wrapper to act as a bridge between platforms. A hybrid app consists of two parts:

  1. The backend code. Hybrid code is written in languages like HTML, CSS, or JavaScript.
  2. A native shell. This shell is downloadable and loads the code using a webview.


Advantages of Hybrid App Development


  • Hybrid apps don’t need a web browser like web apps.
  • Hybrid apps have access to a device’s internal APIs and device hardware.
  • Only one codebase is needed for hybrid apps.


Disadvantages of Hybrid App Development


  • Hybrid apps are much slower than native apps.
  • With hybrid app development, you’re dependent on a third-party platform to deploy the app’s wrapper.
  • The more customization the app requires takes away from hybrid development, which costs more money that can be saved with native app development.


With hybrid app development, you have to contend with issues that stem from both native systems and hybrid systems, which makes bug fixing more difficult. Performance is also a disadvantage because hybrid apps load in a webview. The user experience is often sacrificed with a hybrid app as you cannot customize the app based on the platform.

Customizability is a significant disadvantage to hybrid apps. The more customization you do, the more you’re steering toward a native solution. If customization is important to you, taking the native approach to development will be more beneficial. In fact, the more customization you want in your hybrid app, the more expensive the project will be, and therefore a native solution will end up being more cost-effective.


New call-to-action


Web vs. Native vs. Hybrid: Which Approach is Best?


The decision to build either a web, native or hybrid app should be based on your business objectives. Before jumping into development, you should consider the following factors:

  • How fast you need the app?
  • The quality of the user experience you want your app to have
  • The complexity of features you need for your app to work


Whichever approach you choose should, above all, be quick, responsive, and reliable. As users are demanding more from mobile experiences, it’s important to keep up with their changing demands. Whichever app you decide to build, remember the following:


  • Your API infrastructure should have reliable and easy access to your content and services
  • A mobile app should not be a replication of your website, rather an extension of your brand
  • Always have an understanding of your users’ expectations and behaviors and adapt as market demands change


Finally, it’s important to work with an app development company that specializes in platform-specific design and development.


Should Cost Decide Your Development Approach?


In short, choosing a development method should not be determined solely by cost. The user experience should be the primary factor that helps you decide whether to build a web, native or hybrid app.

While a hybrid app may have lower upfront costs, hybrid apps are more prone to bugs which can end up costing you more money. Not to mention losing frustrated users to subpar user experience. When working with the latest features released for a particular operating system, bugs become a huge concern for hybrid app development. This carries cost implications and can extend the timeline for development.

Similarly, web apps may not be as expensive as native apps, but depending on your business goals and required functionality, a web app might not meet user expectations for experience.


Web vs. Native vs. Hybrid Infographic


The debate surrounding which app type is best is still very relevant today as the lines between the three approaches are becoming increasingly blurred. While the discussion to differentiate the three mobile apps continues, it’s important to remember that you shouldn’t choose an approach for the technology, but instead, choose based on what you want your app to do. If you choose an approach that doesn’t allow your app to utilize device features, for example, then you’ll end up wasting a lot of time and money when you decide to add features.

The choice between web, native, and hybrid development is dependent on a number of factors, including business needs, app requirements, developer skill, and timelines. The bottom line is that each type of app offers an entirely different experience and it’s important to know the strengths and weaknesses of each before jumping into development.



mobile app development infographic


New call-to-action